The Tetrahedron of Will

This page is under repair.(6-8-26)

1/18/07:   Hit and Run Gang  seems to be my earliest use of the Tetrahedron of Will

Now I must (thanks to Meta or other AI) reference others who used it. See previous post. 

Arthur Young. Abraham Maslow.

*Maslow, I knew before the geometric projection.  Arthur Young,after the development of my tetrahedron. 

Already credited Einstein and Plato.   

Must add: Kant, Hegel, Hume, Mill. 

R. Buckminster Fuller.  (In this case a belated credit but right after Plato.   

The Republic I represented in a book report in Junior High. And in High School I attended an assembly with R. Buckminster Fuller, the guest.

*Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: a triangle.

 

5/16/26

Another name and categorical is Emerson and the Existentialists and Romantics.  

Confession: No pun intended.

 In regards to the Tetrahedron of Everything, I may need to give credit to Ken Wilber.  While I was not aware of it at the time, and I had recovered it base on earlier work of mine(i.e. a reading of Plato’s Republic), I may need to give him credit for it.  Even to the point of unconsciously stealing it lock, stock and barrel.  Alternatively it is a case of synchronicity* but it turns out, he had a late night radio program from 1973 to 1982 about such “new age” matters.  This coincides with a period I worked mostly graveyard shifts and had access to a radio.  I recovered this not only through Plato other fields of study.  Only thanks to a  question to Meta AI did I discover that he had the same disciplines on the vertices of the tetrahedron.  They are Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.  HOWEVER: while this has not been run through AI even for cleanup, in a quick search I could not find the sources for what AI had given me on another device.    

A more comprehensive search (who came up with the Tetrahedron of Everything Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.) does not find what I have on my other device either.  But it does remind me to credit Buckminster Fuller who I saw speak at our high school in the early 70’s. Then there is Milo Wolfe who I can not place on the timeline of this process.  More credit to be processed.

https://youtu.be/bc5V_YXvGC8   This has not been viewed yet, but shows four people I have studied.  Three of them in one class.  “Marx, Nietzsche, Freud” and Einstein an early publication.  Sometime in the early 70’s I read the book, Man and his Symbols by Joseph Campbell, with a forward by Carl Jung.

* Update: I have found that Wilbur had not mentioned it until his book in 1995. Which I did not read or have.

5-9-26  However Arthur Youg mentioned a Tetrahedron of Will in 1976>

Zen vis-a-vis Tao

 Is vis-a-vis best or Voltaire?  

Wei Wu Wei ~ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 ~ Non-Dualism, Taoism, Zen, Dzogchen

Chuang Tzu (2) - Zhuang Zhou 莊子 - Selected Teachings for Meditation - Taoism

Why a Taoist is a Threat to Society

Daoist Philosophy: Ease | Zhuangzi’s The Happiness of Fish

        Most Ignore The Third Eye ✅ Open It Instead

Heidegger Towards Death: Being-towards-death

Tetrahedral log: Page One

 Page One https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/09/this-will-start-with-backlog-of.html

Stumbled upon*:    My response to Terrence Howard. 

By Neil deGrasse Tyson

https://youtu.be/1uLi1I3G2N4?si=FCWNGUTmmB6fkEoY

Pardon my neglect in maintaining my skills in blog construction.  Hopefully it is needless to say that I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson and appreciate his perspective, intelligence and patience in addressing the piece submitted to him.   I would certainly be happy if I had such input.  Not that I have made any clear claims that may be disputed or tested.  **

https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/10/tetrahedron-ramble.html

Post under construction:

Tetrahedron Model 

https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Tetrahedron

Bingo!  I must credit a partial reading of The Republic, by Plato and my report on it which involved a tetrahedral pillar.  This is my theory of everything ...of sorts.

https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/07/ie-se-vi-edgy.html

* used before finding out a site by that name existed

** I use a semi-conscious and semi-scientific method[!]

[!] : indicates or punctuates play of words or intended pun.

Nixon to China?*

*see blogsearch box

It was a foreign policy trope.  Hmm.  I guess I was right...at least in the word "trope".   In double checking my use of the word, I addressed my project* in one way.  I have yet tor read the link under the "word", but it was found within a google of "Nixon to China" and suggests "Trump to North Korea" which is one answer to my slightly facetious** search.

Now that I have expanded the geometry or loopiness of the subject, another one just may be "Trump to tropes."  In an earlier pondering of this project, I thought of "Trump to the red line."  Today I really was recognizing the difficulty in this effort, as in the Trump will set you free.

Here is another project.

*Note the 3(now4) locations of my asterisks

** This word is attempting to take the edge off a very serious matter; finding a parallel trope for Trump.  (Ironically it just might be "Trump to Trump.")

List of Trump to tropes[!]
Trump to Nixon?


[!]= sic punctuation

More on the geometrics of everything.

A. but in no particular order or to be arranged later...there is the tetrahedron of will as I reconstructed a platonic book report.
B.  My reference to math being next to Godliness.
C.  the deconstruction of a famous formula into x,y,z & t
D ...may the cable guy be with you or hoist on our own Picard.
Enough charting of points, here is an article that may be relative.

Some prospecting.  Math, geometry and theories are all constructs.  Uniting constructs is problematic.
I have a hunch that some of them are the problem as much as the key.

PS.  I had not even gotten into the piece maybe as far as locality and unitarity, let alone "constructs."

ahhhh..."Rube Goldberg" that's the ticket[!]
or Rubrics Cube or tetrahedron.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

~the problem of one and infinities and paradoxes

~~~a problem with the tetrahedron of will in my physics, psychology, philosophy and politics...
see "bundles of tetrahedrons" and a different rendering.

image credit
Pardon the live-blogging/reading but I better get some zzz's.
bookmark Quest for Quantum Gravity or the Jinga of time and space.

Bookmark

What is the point?
A temp late [!] ( to view later.)
Related charge:
Consciousness
Value of information.

Linguistic turn
Mind outside
???  Not exactly
They say time is the 4th dimension, not that is only one dimention[!]
What about perspective?  Or perpendicular?
My point at this time is that I believe I developed my template of the tetrahedron before running into Arthur Young.  And I am only now in the process of watching his seminar on process theory.i do know I must credit Plato for an earlier model (based on The Republic) which I revamped with the help of Einstein's famous equation and geometry.   (X,Y,Z & P). P for perpendicular and perspective(only now so designated) let alone Plato's ideal or the point.

The Trump Stool...

or carrier pidgeon?
The three legs of his personal reign.
Numbers, euphemisms and visibility.

Pardon My Lack of Follow-up

and maintenance or contributions to this blog, what with Facebook et al...

The cutting edges of something or other...
Overton and the political paradigm?
The Third Way taken to another dimension.  What with the Balkanization of the presidential race.
CUT AND PASTE:

There is nothing wrong with being fiscally conservative. http://www.newsweek.com/.../jerry-brown-saves-california...

I don't have a problem with the claim that it is not progressive enough, we have to get progressives to run and not argue the lesser of two evils is wrong.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo 

The problem is what I call the Overton False Dilemma(formerly the Overton Psychopathy)

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=overton

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=third+way+dimension

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=paradigm

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Trump

http://wonkette.com/607454/to-all-you-nimrods-losing-it-over-hillary-clintons-public-and-private-positions

SEGUE:  wiki  dump  It's the filter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBU665nuEmA
Seth Meyer Tapper Kaine Trump Hotdog.....................  ^ nimrods.

Neo-toll-keen.

Trolling[?]

There was something that inspired this, and there is a tangential creation that I have in process elsewhere. I believe it was the word "bridge", hence the Lord of the Rings reference.
Now for another leap or we've[!]

The "Perception Bridge".  Evonomics.
Capitalization* of Design. Daniel Dennett
Fuller's Manifesto? (R. Buckminster) Maria Popova**


* my take
** cartographer of [?]
"use"

Neo-toll-keen.

Trolling[?]

There was something that inspired this, and there is a tangential creation that I have in process elsewhere. I believe it was the word "bridge", hence the Lord of the Rings reference.
Now for another leap or we've[!]

The "Perception Bridge".  Evonomics.
Capitalization* of Design. Daniel Dennett
Fuller's Manifesto? (R. Buckminster) Maria Popova**


* my take
** cartographer of [?]

Neo-toll-keen.

Trolling[?]

There was something that inspired this, and there is a tangential creation that I have in process elsewhere. I believe it was the word "bridge", hence the Lord of the Rings reference.
Now for another leap or we've[!]

The "Perception Bridge".  Evonomics.
Capitalization* of Design. Daniel Dennett
Fuller's Manifesto? (R. Buckminster) Maria Popova**


* my take
** cartographer of [?]
"use"

Finally Two!

What's all the hullabaloo?

[C-legend need to update.]
A legend is a map of sorts, to a map.
Example:  NFR = not fully read
[!] = (sic) read as intended, pun, irony, sarcasm NFB, not fully blue[!]
or tangents

Congress of Charlatan Conniving?

CJ P. interviews Noam Chomski on the Obama Legacy.

I might call it the problematics of democracy.
But Not Fully Read Yet.
Early questions relate* to suggested Elizabeth Warren / Gary Johnson debate.
I will be looking for positive alternatives from this analysis, especially in foreign policy and diplomacy.  The opposition must be accounted for, as well as the differences in neo-pragmatism.**
Something about working it here before working it over there?  Or the inverse of the pre-Bush(43)con on policeman and nation builders. 

*(The Warren Wing vis a vis the Libertarian Wing of the parties.)
** a fleeting label[!]

A pause-itive thought.

Infinity.

If there is an infinity of time going forward and back, why not the now.
Well, the space-time "continuum" deals with that.

Then, I have three blogs.  They are not mine.  They are just called mine on my Blogspot dashboard.
I don't actually follow them.  They just happen to deal with material and what matters in a parallel way.
Example:

The GOP’s Purity Problem

Transparency: The battle is far from over

We Can Say It, But You Can’t

Now, speaking of dimentions ... [!]

BTW:  I am not conned by Darwin's God.  I've only begun to think and thread lede or ships. 

Models are the new frontier.  Reading is not fundamental.  Math is the bigger picture.

The Dems have a purity problem to, transparency is problematic and Darwin's God may be ironic.

6-10-16
Darned if this doesn't start out* with a wave equation, that is probably related to the geometry of a sphere.

* actually at 3:21

More on "levels".

There was the "Third Way".
Then there is the "Tetrahedron".
We are talking "dimentionalism".
Not just to pun on "mention"alism, but maybe to point to Nominalism.
There is the left and the right and the partisan ship.
The point is that the answer may not be directly between them.
Even with three or four points, where is the answer?
Sanders and Trump "followers" reflect the point that it is not in the middle.

Then there is the quantum leap of "divided government" where partisanship is not the point.
It is that there are three (equal but separate"~") branches. 

With these in mind, the 5th "is out there".  Now that is almost a pun on an amendment.
If the left, right and middle were on an even plane, the fourth might be what might makes.
That might be the direction that followers think right.
Certainly Sanders and Trump don't have the same point, let alone the same plane.

Fn: for "levels" see "Thought Experiment".
Note: the partisan ship of power and the lemon plank.
Then there is the force of laws.

[6 - 3 - 16]

6-2-16
Zombie Run Fold Perspectivism

Thought experiment.

On the suggestion that there are different dimensions of a religion or ideology based on the do amicus [!] ...dynamics of political power, akin to my lemony ship it...*

*links and edits 5-23-16
[!] spell check LOL
(do amicus: auto fill)
[and labels]
[This originated from a comment that there are different "levels" of Islam. Well... there are certainly different perspectives on Christianity.  Do they really depend on whether they are in the majority politically?  This might open up an whole new bailiwick.  ( !?! Sanders and Trump "followers" and the rules.) ] 

Separate thought or tangent:  $13.50 Too muddle against the means.

5-28-16
Jennifer Rubin: Raw Story on Clinton Republicans
Michael Bourne: Salon on Bernie as Clinton VP
David Sloan Wilson: Evonomics on Corporate Evolutionism
Anne Gearan: (RSN) Washington Post on Sanders DNC platform (Cornel West)committer persons.

5-30-16
Perspective in Progress [ ? ]  (/)

Incomplete Geometry

In the process of investigating the genome piece there was a podcast of it which included a prior segment.

[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]

In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.

Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24. 

I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical. 

But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid.  Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?

* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we?  (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling

Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion


https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/


*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)

BTW:
What is living?

5-4-16 
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks:  3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...

5-5-16  OW / VP  (need more labels)

Of(or) re-con4th[!]

Then there is my experience in several aspects of hospitality and structural recreation.
Pardon the conflation of fields, but I leave aside the early years in the hotels and restaurants and bookkeeping.  I refer to exporting building* materials, building a home and maintaining an apartment building, let alone meta-4s.

* not yet read more than a paragraph of so

Two-wrongs don't mean a Left[!]

Too reads do not mean a dialogue. 

Mid-read(NFRY): (i.e. live footnoting)
Survival of the fittest verses(~) corporate species and arms races[!]
Battle of the Narratives? (Corporate offspring, peacocks and elk.)
(head or tails not treated equally, but...)[somewhat akin to gander or goose?]
[fundamental try-vergence]...(grain v ladder)[LOL read v regulations]
Survival of the Narratives?

4-3-16 to read:
The Atlantic: Obama Doctrine
4-4-16
Hedges/Hudson on Neo-Liberal Economics.

[related (b.s.): Spencer... demo/mice...DecomPart * Meantalizing]
*Moline's Platonics  / Darwinian Physics